An independent evaluation of the RRANZ Leadership Development Programme confirmed its significant positive impact on emergency management leadership capability while identifying opportunities for targeted enhancement and sector-wide development.
During 2024, Christine Owen from the University of Tasmania assessed the programme's effectiveness and impact using Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model, surveying 70 and interviewing 10 alumni.
Key findings
Programme impact
- High participant satisfaction with course content and delivery, with satisfaction ratings consistently above 85%
- Significant improvements reported in key leadership capabilities, particularly in:
- Setting strategic direction
- Managing relationships
- Self-management
- Managing work priorities
Capability development
- Full-time emergency management staff reported greater gains in:
- Strategic thinking and problem-solving
- Achieving through others
- Communication and influence
- Emotional management under pressure
- Part-time emergency management staff showed stronger improvements in:
- Self-awareness and adaptability
- The ability to make difficult decisions for community benefit
Areas for development
Need for additional focus on:
- Technical role-specific training
- Negotiation skills
- Political acumen
- Stakeholder engagement
- Team performance management
Implementation challenges
Participants identified several sector-wide challenges:
- Maintaining competency and currency in roles
- Managing transitions between routine and crisis operations
- Balancing community expectations with resource constraints
- Navigating political interfaces
Moving forward
- Course refinements
- Maintain current crisis leadership focus.
- Enhance guidance on reflective learning.
- Clarify course marketing and expectations.
- Future development
- Develop tactical emergency operations centre training
- Consider specialised modules for recovery and cultural engagement
- Create opportunities for extended practical exercises
- Review and streamline leadership capability framework
- Structural considerations
- Maintain focus on professional development rather than assessment
- Support sector-wide resource and capability gaps
- Develop support for ongoing skill maintenance

